4 comments

  1. s

    I agree with the sentiments shared in your rant: it’s why I’ve always found the ‘wish fulfillment’ criticism a lazy one. Like, a lot of media, including the great ones we find timeless, are based on some kind of wish fulfillment; it’s almost like that shit shouldn’t matter and instead, we should care about whether the story, despite its wish fulfillment foundation, is grounded by some truthfulness of the human experience. BokuYaba, for example, is an emotionally powerful and engaging romcom; and yet it can broadly be accused of being another drop in the wish fulfillment pantheon of a loser boy getting the hot, out-of-his-league girl. Obviously, what elevates something like that from being JUST wish fulfillment is that the emotional journey the characters go through gets at the heart of something true and raw of human psychological, which in turn, grounds the premise into something more, flipping the wish fulfillment into a real and believable circumstance

    To a much lesser extent than BokuYaba, Otanashi and Kuranika follow a similar principle of using their “wish fulfillment” premise to explore something true about life: Otanashi emphasizes the genuineness of a group of friends engaging in the process of loving each others’ company and growing comfortable with expressing their true selves around one another; Kuranika celebrates earnestness and how that makes for strong, reliable bonds between people. The ones who scream ‘wish fulfillment’ as a lazy pejorative (and simply make that the crux of their argument) against shows like Otanashi or Kuranika , do so because they’re still too emotionally immature and mentally rigid to escape the confines of their overly simplistic worldview while brazenly conflating wish fulfillment with a lack of realism. Yes people, men AND women will be willing to date someone “less hot than them” if that person has a strong, endearing character. It’s wish fulfillment to portray that specific circumstance within the lens that it COULD happen to you, but that doesn’t make the idea of hot people falling for a “less than attractive” for being a good person, a delusional wish, especially since it happens QUITE A LOT!

    Overall, I think Otanashi has been a good adaptation of the source material so far and succeeds for all the reasons you’ve mentioned and that I alluded to when recommending it. Kuranika’s adaptation on the other hand is fine, but it’s doing what I predicted it would and is kind of just glossing over the finer details of the source material’s storytelling that made what would be normally be a generic story into a more meaningful one. Luckily the earnestness of the work is still shining through and making for an enjoyable watch despite it all

  2. I like them both, as I said, but this show is overall more engaging for me.

    When you talk about the source material with Kuranika do you mean the LN or the manga? From what I read the animu is basically following the manga.

  3. s

    Mostly referring to the manga here: from what I understand, it follows the LN closely enough but remixes certain bits of dialogue and adds personal touches from the mangaka themselves to better reflect/distinguish their interpretation of the original material. Now as far as the faithfulness to the manga goes; again, it’s the anime glossing over of the finer details in the storytelling that I’m finding fault with, as it’s those details that are responsible for making what should be a by-the-numbers romcom feel more like a conscientiously put-together, emotionally tender teenage romance.

    To put it as simply as I can, the manga sits in its character moments longer, providing that extra bit of nuance to its circumstances whereas the anime glosses over, omits, and rearranges stuff in a way that kinda diminishes some of the storytelling impact of its scenes. For example, they montaged the back half of Maki and Umi’s date in ep 2, despite those interactions showing them becoming closer and highlighting the moment Maki realizes how fulfilling his relationship with Umi is starting to feel. The cause-and-effect logic of the story feels compromised in a way that it just isn’t in the manga because there, the connective tissue informing the thoughts and actions of the characters is better established and so the storytelling cohesion retains its effectiveness

    The anime has done a fine-enough job representing the series, but some of its adaptation decisions are sloppy enough that even if you weren’t a source material reader, you can feel moments of awkward rearranging. Take for example in the very first episode where Umi suggest her and Maki should go out into town on their next date; she says next week, but by episode 2, next week arrives and they’re spending that Friday indoors playing games again, with the date they planned for that week happening on the following Friday. This inconsistency is a result of the anime adapting Umi’s date proposal within ep 1, instead of adapting it when it was supposed to happen, which was during the Friday indoor hangout in episode 2 when Maki is coming clean for “spying” on Umi’s run-in with her senpai’s confession. The anime needed Maki to have come clean about spying on Umi BEFORE their date to stay consistent with the logic of events from the source material, but it forgot that it already had Umi establish in episode 1 that the next time they’d meet up, they’d be going out into town, so it just ends up looking like Umi and Maki just randomly changed their minds or something. The inconsistency is not a big deal in the grand scheme of things and can easily be overlooked, but not making proper adjustments to the script to account for and keep consistent anime adaptation changes demonstrates a flimsiness in your series composition, and makes your series planning look a bit tacky, and doesn’t bode much confidence that the production team is locked in with providing the most sensible adaptation they’re capable of.

    As I said before, the genuineness of Kuranika’s shines through enough for me to be enjoying the anime, but between it and Otanashi, the latters’ adaptation is better succeeding at capturing its source material’s strengths

  4. R

    I think this is the same discussion with the Hokkaido Girls review. For some reason genre about guys just being nice and getting girls, people saw it as unrealistic and wish fulfillment.

    About guilty pleasure… I think it’s because guilty pleasure implies that it refers to something shallow or perverted (or gooner material, though I don’t like using that word).

Leave a Comment