Ryman’s Club – 10

I’d be lying if I said that episode wasn’t a bit of a disappointment.  But not, notably, a surprise.  Just to reflect on what I wrote after Episode 8:

If I were a betting man, I’d say that izakaya scene is setting up a scenario where the E.D. and Mikoto make a “bet” where the team will be disbanded unless it wins the S/J League – which would be pretty on the nose, but still potentially entertaining.

And last week:

The one potentially off element is the business with the badminton-hating executive director.  It has the feel of tacked-on drama potentially, though that’s all conjecture at this point.

I take no particular pleasure in being right in this instance.  Because, of course, the implication there is that this was a very predictable turn.  That’s OK in itself, because it can mean a story is following the internal logic it’s set up for itself.  In this instance though the turn we’ve taken is kind of wearisome – a lot less interesting and fresh than most of what Ryman’s Club has done so far.  It feels, as I said, like tacked-on drama.  It’s not necessary for this to be a compelling narrative.  And what’s more, it’s played in much broader and lazier terms than the rest of the story.  The cartoon villain nature of the executive director character is the proof of that.

So, Ryman’s followed up probably its best episode with probably its worst.  But it was still by far the best sports anime episode of the day, so that’s all relative.  There were some good moments here – I enjoyed seeing the Saeki Brothers in action, forced to be the A doubles team against Unisics because Tatsu was on trial (effectively) for supposedly injuring an important client.  The little trick with Touya using Souta’s head as a screen for his smashes was clever if (I’m guessing) unrealistic.  The net-cord bit?  Well, I don’t know badminton but I do know tennis, and if that’s anything to go by the idea that a player could intentionally cause net-cord winners at will is pretty ludicrous.  But hey, it was still fun.

As to the whole courtroom scene, well, it wasn’t great.  The E.D. being able to get away with obviously fabricating the whole thing seems ludicrous (that word again) to me.  But then, I don’t know exactly how boardroom situations work here, never having been in one.  The caveat is that I do know that Japanese corporations are generally pretty awful, that due process is pretty much nonexistent, and that the preferred method of getting rid of someone (whether for just cause or not) is to shame them into quitting rather than fire them.

I would also say, for the record, that skipping over Usuyama-san’s first match with the team seemed like an odd choice – especially given that it was such an important one.  And double especially because his opponent, Misora-kun, had gotten some exposition and now presumably disappears from the narrative.  Sunshine beating Unisics 2-0 without having their top doubles team is unlikely to say the least, but clearly the series is saving the big expenditures in time and animation for the Mitsuhoshi match. They’ve been built up as the big bad all along but rarely seen, so they come into the final tie as something of a mystery team.  It does include Tatsu’s old partner Izumo, so that will presumably be one of the emotional crescendoes of the final two episodes.

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 comments

  1. Yeah, the whole ExecDir subplot sucks. It’s a tacked on Serious Development™ and shows that the creators lack faith that their characters and the story are sufficient to carry the show (which they are). Substituting boardroom nastiness for real badminton action saves a ton of money on animation, so maybe this is Production Committee Syndrome in action. But more business interplay between the team members would have done the same thing without derailing the story.

    I’ll see this show through. Hopefully, I won’t have to hit fast forward in the last two episodes, as I did during this one.

  2. R

    Agreed that all the boardroom drama was unnecessary and done poorly. Hopefully we’ve seen the last of it, although I guess there’s still the whole “dissolution of the team if they lose” part. Maybe the writers felt there needed to be more riding on the final game, but there really didn’t. The build up of Mikoto and Tatsu’s relationship would have been enough.

  3. I think in part it’s a reaction to trying to do a sports series in 1 cour. There’s a perceived need to manufacture a “dramatic” conclusion.

  4. J

    They could’ve done this a lot more realistically if you ask me. That executive director has stated before that Sunlight’s been going through some hard times lately with fiscal losses and being a hardass when it comes to marketing gimmicks like Mikoto’s ginger ale proposal that he only reluctantly gave a budget to. Why not make it so that he thinks that due to their financial losses, they cannot afford to keep the badminton team going because they’ve been pouring money into this and they’re not seeing any return on investment, especially with their current lousy win-lose ratio? So that’s where you have Mikoto reasoning that it’s still possible for them to keep it afloat longer as long as they do well in the tournament, damn the ROI, and aware that the ginger ale beverage he came up with at the start of the series is just about ready to ship and guaranteed to turn a profit for Sunlight, saving their fortunes in the process.

    That would be much more plausible than simply that the executive director hates badminton and wants to eject Tatsuru from the company by abusing his power and conspiring with the vice president so he can shut it down with no one there to protect it. That’s some Love Live shit right there.

Leave a Comment